The short answer
A week has 168 hours. A typical private-duty client might be visited for 12 to 20 of them. Everything that happens in the other 150 hours, the 3 a.m. trip to the bathroom, the fall in the kitchen at noon on a day with no visit, is outside the agency’s awareness unless something reports it. The agencies that handle this well do three things: they map which hours carry the most risk for each client, they write a response plan the family agrees to, and they put something in the home that notices a fall when nobody is there.
The arithmetic of a care week
Home care is scheduled in visits, and visits are scheduled around the tasks that need a person: bathing, medication, meals, companionship, a drive to an appointment. That is the right way to schedule care and the wrong way to think about risk, because risk does not keep office hours.
Put the numbers next to each other for one client. Three visits a week of four hours is 12 hours of presence. A daily two-hour morning visit is 14. A live-in arrangement covers far more but still has sleeping hours and days off. Against that, the client is home and awake for perhaps 100 hours a week and asleep for the rest, and the two windows with the most falls, the early morning and the late evening, are the two least likely to have a caregiver in the house.
Nothing about this is a failure of scheduling. It is the shape of home care. The question is what the agency knows about those hours, and what it has promised the family it will do about them.
What goes wrong in the uncovered hours
Falls, mostly. The CDC reports that about one in four adults aged 65 and older falls each year, that falls are the leading cause of injury and injury death in that age group, and that they account for roughly three million emergency department visits a year in the United States (CDC, Facts About Falls). Most of those falls happen at home.
The fall is only half of the problem. The other half is the time spent on the floor afterwards. A study of older people who fell at home found that a large share could not get up without help, and that those who lay on the floor for an hour or more had markedly worse outcomes in the months that followed, with pressure injuries, dehydration, pneumonia and a loss of confidence that itself leads to the next fall (Wild, Nayak and Isaacs, BMJ, 1981). Clinicians call it the long lie, and it is a between-visits problem by definition: a client who falls during a visit is helped up in seconds.
The quieter harms sit alongside. A client who is afraid of falling stops moving, and a client who stops moving gets weaker. Adult children who cannot reach a parent by phone spend the evening imagining the floor. Both of those end up as calls to your office.
What agencies do about it today, and where each falls short
| Approach | What it covers | Where it fails |
|---|---|---|
| Scheduled check-in calls | Confirms the client is up and answering at fixed times | Only at those times; a fall ten minutes after the call is found at the next one. Depends on the client reaching the phone. |
| Medical alert pendant or watch | Lets the client call for help from anywhere it is worn | Has to be worn, charged and pressed. Many clients leave it on the nightstand or refuse it. Automatic fall detection on wearables is uneven. |
| Cameras installed by the family | Lets a relative look in remotely | Someone has to be watching. Most families and many clients refuse cameras in bedrooms and bathrooms, which is where the falls are. |
| Family rota | Daily contact from a daughter or a neighbour | Unevenly kept, and the family is often in another city. It also puts the agency outside the loop. |
| Overnight or live-in shifts | A person in the house | The right answer for high-need clients, and unaffordable for most families for a risk that is real but occasional. |
| Room-based fall detection | Notices a possible fall in the rooms it is placed in, day and night, with nothing to wear | Covers only those rooms, needs power and Wi-Fi, and produces some false alarms. Still needs a human response plan. |
Every row needs the same thing to work: a plan for what happens when the signal arrives. A pendant nobody answers and a sensor nobody has assigned to a coordinator are the same non-answer.
A between-visits plan you can write this week
- Map the risk hours for each client. Note when they get up, when they bathe, when they are alone longest, and what their fall history says. Two clients with the same schedule can have opposite risk maps.
- Decide what should notice a fall in those hours. A check-in call at the top of the highest-risk window, a wearable if the client will actually wear it, room-based detection in the two or three rooms that matter. Write down what each one will and will not catch.
- Write the response tree. Who is called first, second, third; what “no answer” means at each step; when a caregiver is dispatched; when emergency services are called; who has a key. Include nights and weekends explicitly, because that is when the tree gets tested.
- Agree it with the family, in writing. The family should know what the agency will do, what they are expected to do, and what the plan cannot promise. The National Institute on Aging’s guidance on staying at home as needs change is a good frame for that conversation.
- Document every event and review the plan. Each alert, real or false, is information about the client. A monthly look at the log is where care plans get better and where families see the value of the service.
What to tell a family
“Our visits cover the hours you have chosen. For the hours in between, this is what will notice if something goes wrong, this is who will be called and in what order, and this is what we cannot promise. Let’s agree on it together and review it every month.” The families who hear that sentence rarely go looking for another agency.
Where Senecta fits
Senecta’s pods are the room-based row in the table above, offered under your agency’s name. They use thermal sensing and sound, not cameras and not wearables, to notice a possible fall in the rooms where they sit, and they can check in with the client and alert the contacts in your response tree. They do not add a caregiver shift, they do not replace one, and they do not catch every fall; they give your agency a presence in the 150 hours it used to know nothing about. How Senecta detects a possible fall without cameras or wearables explains the mechanism in detail.
For an agency, the between-visits plan is the product and the pod is the part of it that works at 3 a.m. Families buy the plan.
Next step
See it with your own homes in mind.
Thirty minutes, your care plans and your questions. We will walk through rooms, response workflow, branding and rollout.
Book your agency demoSenecta makes the fall-detection pods described here, so this is our explanation of the product and the problem it addresses, not an independent evaluation. Senecta is not an emergency service, does not replace in-person care, and no system detects every fall. Sources were checked on September 16, 2026.